Social Issue Essay: Divorce

“Till death do us part” is an extremely familiar phrase that is commonly associated with marriage. It is a phrase that comes from the marriage liturgy in the Book of Common Prayer. Despite that many couples agree to remain with their partner until death when they say the words “I do”, many marriages will end with divorce instead of death. It appears that as time is progressing, divorce is becoming a more and more frequent occurrence, especially in the United States. As divorce is becoming more common, it is becoming a greater social issue in America. I want to discuss exactly why divorce is a social issue, particularly because it only appears to affect two people, and how sociology helps society to understand it.

family-divorce-lawyer1

The effects of divorce reach beyond just the two individuals directly involved.

It was in 1969 that the governor of California enacted what was essentially the “no-fault divorce bill” that basically allowed any couple within the borders of California to get a divorce for realistically no reason at all (Wilcox, 2009). Within the next 10 to 15 years, every other state in the U.S. adopted a bill that was similar to the one in California. Since then, divorce rates have obviously been on the rise.  According to Centers for Disease Control and Protection, in 2009 there were about 6.8 marriages per 1,000 of the total population and there were 3.4 divorces per 1,000 of the total population. Even though these numbers only account for 0.68 percent and 0.34 percent of the population respectively, this still entails that approximately 50 percent of marriages ended in divorce in 2009 (Centers, 2012). Divorce affects beyond the two individuals that are married, even more so when children are involved. According to National Affairs, around 1 million children have witnessed their parents go through a divorce. This affects society more deeply than perhaps a lot of people realize. Sociologist Paul Amato estimated that if there was the same level of family stability as there was in the 1960’s, the United States would have “750,000 fewer children repeating grades, 1.2 million fewer school suspensions, approximately 500,000 fewer acts of teenage delinquency, about 600,000 fewer kids receiving therapy, and approximately 70,000 fewer suicide attempts every year” (Wilcox, 2009). It is apparent that this is, in fact, a social issue.

It is through sociology that we can better understand why divorce is such a common occurrence particularly in the United States.  In the textbook, Sociology: The Essentials, it explains that there are multiple factors that can contribute. Typically, when thinking of the causes of divorces, I and perhaps many other people, imagine that there are problems between the husband and wife that can’t seemed to be resolved.  Therefore, divorce appears to be the only viable solution. Yet, Sociology: The Essentials offers a lot more insight to really why the divorce rate is so high in America. Demographic alterations are actually legitimate causes for the increase of divorces. This is because, as the textbook explained perfectly, “in earlier eras, people died younger…Some marriages that earlier would have ended with death of a spouse may now be dissolved with divorce” (Anderson, 2009). When looking at more cultural-based factors, individualism has become a cultural norm in society. With individualism in marriage, it puts a stronger emphasis on an individual’s personal satisfaction instead of their spouse’s. This social norm results in individuals breaking the bonds of marriage solely out of unhappiness. One final reason for the growing number of divorces in America that is given in Sociology: The Essentials is that as time has progressed, women’s roles have changed.  As the roles of women have altered over time, women have become less financially dependent on men whereas in earlier years, marriage was necessary for some women to achieve financial stability (Anderson, 2009). When examining societal changes and norms, it makes it easier to understand and visualize why, exactly, divorce has gradually become more common over the years.

To conclude, it is apparent that divorce is more frequent in society today. Divorce is a social issue and can potential impact many people, especially children. Perhaps what is most intriguing about this is that societal norms and ideals influence marriages/divorces, which in turn, affects society. Sociology is able to identify this and even explain certain aspects of this cycle which is what makes sociology such an interesting and valuable study.

This article is from Web M.D. and it discusses how divorce negatively affects children’s academic performance and social skills: http://children.webmd.com/news/20110602/divorce-affects-kids-academic-social-skills

References

References

Anderson, Margaret L. and Taylor, Howard F. Sociology: The Essentials. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2009. Print.

Centers for Disease Control and Protection. (2012, Mar.). Marriage and Divorce. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/divorce.htm

Cheney, Paul. (2009). Intro to Sociology: Chapter 13—Family. Retrieved from http://freebooks.uvu.edu/SOC1010/index.php/ch13-family.html

Wilcox, Bradford. (2009). The Evolution of Divorce. Retrieved from http://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-evolution-of-divorce

Chapter 11: Gender Socialization

The term “Gender Socialization” refers to the way that men and women learn the expectations associated with their sex. In the textbook, Sociology: Essentials, it goes on to explain that “the rules of gender extend to all aspects of society and daily life…[It] affects the self-concepts of women and men, their social and political attitudes, their perceptions about other people, and their feelings about relationships with others”. Essentially, Gender Socialization is used to explain why men and women think, act, and do the things they do that are considered to be “specific” to their gender.

I chose this particular topic because I simply find it fascinating. From the time that you are born and through your entire life, Gender Socialization is taking place. It’s interesting because growing up it doesn’t seem to be very apparent. I was given dolls for Christmas and my brother was given cars or building blocks.  All of those seemingly insignificant instances in my life were part of Gender Socialization–they were affecting how I would grow up to be and teaching me what was to be expected of me.

I chose Brittani Comstock’s discussion post. It read, “I thought the video about the princess boy was so sweet and definitely eye opening for many parents who have children who prefer to dress up in clothes or play with the unconventional toys for their gender. I do not have children myself, but when I do someday I plan on letting them be whoever they want to be so long as they are happy.  When I was younger I loved playing with toy cars and dinosaurs and I even had a collection of rubber snakes and bugs, yet I never recall my parents questioning my choice of toys or worrying that I was acting ‘too much like a tomboy’ for being a girl.  Now that I have grown up I still love to do activities that might be considered tomboyish, but I also love to put on a cute outfit and do my makeup and feel pretty like a lot of girls! I don’t think parents should be so concerned about how their children prefer to play when all they are doing is being kids and having a good time.”

I thought that Brittani touched on a growing issue in society today–that is, the association of certain items, colors, etc. with gender and how it effects how society looks at an individual. I have to agree with Brittani, because I also though that the video “Princess Boy” was eye-opening. People automatically assumed that because the boy liked to wear dresses, he was either a “little-off” or was undoubtedly going to be gay.  It is saddening that this is the case. I am also just like Brittani in the sense that when I was younger, I would’ve been considered a complete tomboy. Even today I also participate in activities and do things “tomboyish”, just as Brittani said, yet I still have times where I love to do my hair and make-up and feel feminie and girly.

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1018709905920?LI=true# (Online Journal Article). The PDF download is available on this site. This journal article simply as the title of the website says, examines violence and gender roles, specifically pertaining to video games. It tells of the “implications of gener socialization and aggressive behavior”.

http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=search.displayRecord&uid=1991-15054-001 (Online Journal Article). This link only provides the abstract of this article, but I still found it interesting. Unfortunately the full article cost $11.95, but I thought that, based on the abstract, it would be a very informative and interesting article. It plans to discuss the if parents make systematic difference when raising girls versus boys or vice versa.

Through gender socialization, gender identity is formed. Gender identity has a particularly strong effect on how people feel about their appearance. Men learn that they are expected to be strong, masculine, and muscular. In some cases, the weight of expectations can lead to drastic measures. In this case, a man using steroids to build muscle.

Below is another visual example of gender socialization affecting gender identity but with a woman instead. The picture(s) below are of a girl before she had anorexia and after she had been anorexic for a while. I believe this girl actually ended up passing away because of her anorexia.

Women learn that they are expected to be beautiful, feminine, and thin. Sometimes the weight of gender expectations can lead to drastic measures, such as women becoming anorexic or bulimic.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DU_T6XB4i1k (Video). This video demonstrates male gender socialization in a very intriguing way–Disney movies and the male characters in them. The video goes through multiple Disney movies and shows how “manly men” are depicted in comparison to “unmanly/weak/goofy men”. In nearly every movie, the main male characters are handsome, well-built, and in some cases arrogant. Not only is the video showing how gender socialization is incorporated into Disney films, but these Disney films are essentially reinforcing gender socialization as young kids watch them.

http://www.unicef.org/earlychildhood/index_40749.html (Internet Site). This is UNICEF’s website. It explains in good depth gender socialization during early childhood. Not only does it define gender socialization, but it tells what girls and boys are expected to do, behave, say, etc. in order to conform with the norms of society for their particular gender.

http://ckbooks.com/mix-books/introduction-to-sociology/gender-socialization/ (Internet Site). This website discusses the various roles different people/aspects of life play in gender socialization, such as family, peers, school, etc.

http://www.firstpost.com/living/out-damn-hair-depilatory-creams-target-the-small-town-girl-494311.html (Online Article). This online article talks about a girl who has some form of hormone irregularity that causes her to grow facial hair like a man. Due to her religious beliefs, she will not shave/remove her facial hair and because of this, she is treated differently–criticized, stared at, etc. It is because of gender socialization and gender identity, that society is seemingly unwillingly to accept a woman with facial hair.

Chapter 7: Durkheim’s Deviance & Social Solidarity

One chapter out of the textbook that caught my attention was chapter 7. I always found looking at crimes or even just acts of deviance to be interesting, especially when digging deeper to find the motives behind such things. Perhaps, this interest was sparked from watching numerous episodes of T.V. shows such as C.S.I., Law and Order, Bones, and more. Out of this chapter, a couple of things stood out to me that inspired me to make them my topic of choice. They are, as the title tells, deviance and social solidarity, as defined by Emile Durkeim. I chose two because I feel that both of these things go hand-in-hand fairly well.

As far as the best discussion post that I read…I couldn’t choose just one, so instead I’m taking excerpts from two. Many of my classmates mentioned this same idea in their posts (even I did) and I thought that it linked the two topics I chose together well. The first excerpt is written by Nathanial Kite. It reads:

“Durkheim argued that crime and deviance are a viable part of society, needed to show what is the presumable normal behavior is. By punishing criminals, society reaffirms its own values. If crimes were not committed, then the values of society would become blurred…Durkheim believed showing the criminal and the punishments to all people was a way to hopefully prevent acts that go against the norm.”

The second excerpt, written by Haley Kausen, reads as follows:

“One of Durkheim’s most important insights is that ‘deviance provides social solidarity. Instead of breaking society up, deviance produces a pulling together, or social solidarity’…When acts of deviance are publicly punished, then the general social standards are confirmed.”

http://search.proquest.com/socabs/docview/60935663/13983CFE96B4173000/7?accountid=14551 (Journal Article). This is a link to a scholarly journal abstract. I used the U of I online library source and was able to find links to various scholarly journals pertaining to the topic I searched, but it only gave me the abstracts. This article is discussing Durkheim’s functionalist approach to deviance.

http://www.academia.edu/1890257/Durkheim_Terrorism_and_Positive_Deviance (Journal Article). This particular scholarly journal article is focused around the idea of positive deviance, which Durkheim theorized about. He theorized that deviance was used in a positive manner because it was able to reaffirm society’s norms and ultimately create social solidarity.

I chose this picture to repsent my topic of Deviance and Social Solidarity because it encompasses both aspects of this topic. The girl holding the sign is a deviant because she bullied other students, which violates society’s norms. Consequently, she was punished to show that she performed an act of deviance. As both Haley and Nathaniel stated, public punishment of deviants reaffirms social norms and standards, creating social solidarity by pulling society together and demonstrating to others that acts of deviance will reap consequences.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9mzbpftczU&feature=related (Video). It is a video of a Sociologist who goes through and defines “deviance”, the various parts of deviance, and the contradictive functions it is said to have in society.

http://shortell.org/node/4 (Internet Site). This website is titled “Durkheim’s Sociology: On Social Solidarity”. It discusses Durkheim’s theories on Social Solidarity and the different types of it.

http://www.sociology.org.uk/pcfcri95.pdf (Internet Site). This link discusses the Functionalist explanations of deviance, including Durkheim’s theory regarding deviance. This website also incorporates Durkheim’s Rule of Sociological Method.

http://www.gazettetimes.com/news/local/article_4baaf10e-27a0-11e1-94f9-001871e3ce6c.html (Online Article). This link is to a news article that was posted on December 18th, 2011. The article is titled “Random acts of deviants”. It talks about individuals from a Sociology class that were assigned to perform positive acts of deviance, such as offering to pay for a stranger’s coffee, and seeing how people react.

About Me

Hi, everyone! To begin, my name is Aimee Nicole Barfuss (formally Aimee Nicole Konewko). I recently got married to a wonderful man named Byron on September 1st of this year.  I am the second oldest child. I have two wonderful parents whom I look up to and I would consider to be my heroes.

Byron and me(:

I am living in Moscow and working on completing my second year of college. I completed my first year at Brigham Young University-Idaho and was planning on graduating from there with a degree in Social Work. Plans changed when Byron (who attended and still attends U of I) proposed, and I decided to transfer to be with him (obviously!). It turns out that there isn’t a Social Work program at the University of Idaho, so I’m deciding to pursue a different degree which is closely related–Sociology.

That is a beginning introduction into why I am interested in Sociology. I find Sociology and Psychology to be extremely intriguing. I love to learn how things work, especially something as complex as the human mind and society. Learning about the different theories that can potentially explain why people do or don’t do certain things and how people function together to create society are just some things that I find exciting. Essentially, Sociology is just something that I love and I always told myself that I would pursue a career (or even just a degree) in something that I love.

I chose this picture to represent, what I feel, is the power of Sociology. I feel that the more we grow to understand how people behave and function in society, the more we can learn about how to create unity among people. I think that it is through Sociology and other fields of study that we, as people, can come closer to truly attaining “unity within diversity”.